A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst prospective neighbours over the construction of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of organizing breaches, environmental problems, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions report about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has progressed right into a really publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, seek out to construct their loved ones house. The situation happens to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming manufactured by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted less than arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their setting up permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment with a Specific Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore places are issue to stringent controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal surroundings which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful team has characterised the action being an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, wherever views of the sea are the two very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic endeavours by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-substantial drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture which has given that become emblematic of your intensity of the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain Visible evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Instances reported, describing how the two Adult males entered the water all through significant climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the website turned Just about the most putting descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Moments posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps had been cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a place impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately from the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as readers sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant from the authorized timeline.
On the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as manufactured, goes outside of what was permitted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning paperwork, maps, and situations hooked up to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both stressed that their motion is determined by concern for environmental security and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public perspective, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they've described their extended-standing relationship to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as René Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times a couple only wanting to establish a loved ones household in accordance Using the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Unique Place of Conservation and say that every one functions are already performed based on Skilled assistance and authorised ideas. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like coming into The ocean through a storm, never alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above building of wall at coastal web site is becoming a shorthand description for any circumstance that lots of observers see as more and more typical. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation amongst private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Occasions posting about René Collier observed the businessman experienced Earlier been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-significant h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by way of midsection-high water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Times are phrases that appeared regularly in coverage, reflecting equally the Actual physical truth of the coastline as well as the symbolic character on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to ascertain if the wall as created complies with arranging permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and organizing situations. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who have to Reside alongside one another extended once the authorized fees have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction is effective at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, although the implications of the case increase over and above that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the importance of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when basic difficulties like environmental defense and property rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of purely natural elegance and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre of the dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter whether it will eventually in the end be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will count on the court docket’s findings. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.